ISRAEL IS AN
APARTHEID STATE
Gérard Araud,
the charmingly blunt French ambassador to the United States, is famous for two
things: the lavish parties he hosts at his Kalorama mansion, and his willingness
to say (and tweet) things that other ambassadors might not even think, much
less state in public.
Araud ends his
nearly five-year tenure in Washington today, and when I spoke with him last
week, he was, even by his usual standards, direct to the point of discomfort.
He told me his view of the U.S. (“The role of the United States as a policeman
of the world, it’s over”) and Donald Trump (“brutal, a bit primitive, but in a
sense he’s right” on free trade), and he shared his opinions of John Bolton (he’s
a “real professional,” even though “he hates international organizations”) and
Jared Kushner (“extremely smart, but he has no guts”).
He also had a
warning to anyone who assumes it will be “business as usual” once America’s
Trump fever breaks. The idea that the Trump presidency is some sort of
accident, he says, is a fantasy.
Trump’s
presidency complicated Araud’s diplomatic work in several ways. Like everyone
else in Washington, he scrambled to respond to the abrupt withdrawal of
American troops from Syria, the demise of the Iran nuclear deal, and the U.S.
pullout from the Paris climate accords. But the most difficult moment of his
career, he told me, came in the early hours of November 9, 2016, just after
Trump was elected, when Araud tweeted: “After Brexit, after Trump, a world is collapsing.”
Yara Bayoumy:
Your career started out in the Middle East. Where do you see the situation
there now, especially with the peace process?
Gérard Araud:
I’m close to Jared Kushner … Everywhere in the history of mankind, when there
is a negotiation between two sides, the more powerful [party] is imposing terms
on the weaker party. That’s the basis of Jared Kushner’s [peace plan]—it will
be a proposal very close to what the Israelis want. Is it doomed to fail? I
should say 99 percent yes, but 1 percent, you never forget the 1 percent.
Trump is
uniquely able to push the Israelis, because he is so popular in Israel.
Bayoumy: But
Trump hasn’t pushed the Israelis so far.
Araud: Exactly,
but if need be, he may do it. Once Trump told Macron, “I have given everything
to the Israelis; the Israelis will have to give me something.” He is totally
transactional. He is more popular than [Benjamin] Netanyahu in Israel, so the
Israelis trust him. That’s the first bet, Kushner told me.
The second is
that the Palestinians may consider, it’s their last chance to get limited
sovereignty. And the third element is Kushner is going to pour money on the
Palestinians. Don’t forget, the Arabs are behind the Americans. The plan is 50
pages, we were told, very precise; we don’t know what is in the plan. But we’ll
see.
The problem is
that the disproportion of power is such between the two sides that the
strongest may conclude that they have no interest to make concessions. And also
the fact that the status quo is extremely comfortable for Israel. Because they
[can] have the cake and eat it.
They have the
West Bank, but at the same time they don’t have to make the painful decision
about the Palestinians, really making them really, totally stateless or making
them citizens of Israel. They won’t make them citizens of Israel. So they will
have to make it official, which is we know the situation, which is an
apartheid. There will be officially an apartheid state. They are in fact
already.
Bayoumy: How do
you feel Kushner approached the peace plan?
Araud: He is
totally in real-estate mode. He is totally dry. He’s extremely smart, but he
has no guts. He doesn’t know the history. And in a sense, it’s good—we are not
here to say who is right, who is wrong; we are trying to find a way. So in a
sense, I like it, but at the same time he is so rational, and he is so
pro-Israeli also, that he may neglect the point that if you offer the
Palestinians the choice between surrendering and committing suicide, they may
decide the latter. Somebody like Kushner doesn’t understand
that.
(excerpts from The Atlantic)
Comments
Post a Comment