ISRAEL-HEZBOLLAH AGREEMENT OPENS THE WAY FOR PEACE IN LEBANON
Pressure exerted by France and the United States to achieve peace in Lebanon has finally resulted in a two-month ceasefire between Israel and the radical group Hezbollah. Israeli forces will withdraw from the southern part of Lebanon that they occupied and the Shiite group, supported by Iran, will do the same, retreating to about 30 km from the border. This means a significant decrease in the offensive military capacity of the group that fights the Jewish state.
The ceasefire began this morning, although Hezbollah claimed that IDF forces had bombed an area south of the Lebanese capital; an accusation that has not been confirmed by independent sources. On the other hand, as the Jewish military withdraws, it will be the Lebanese national army that occupies the abandoned positions.
This agreement does not mean that it will have an effect on the war in Gaza or on the release of the hostages still held by Hamas, which would be between 60 and 80 people. US President Joe Biden believes that the agreement in Lebanon can facilitate a more or less similar compromise in Gaza, but Prime Minister Netanyahu has ruled it out and even stated that Hamas will find itself more isolated, by losing the support of Hezbollah. President Biden has informed his successor, Donald Trump, that the ceasefire “must become a permanent ceasefire of hostilities between the two parties.”
Hezbollah said today that the accepted compromise means that there will be no violation of Lebanese territory, a demand that the radical group highlighted during the negotiations with Washington and Paris. The agreement is based on resolution 1701 of the United Nations General Security Council, which sets the withdrawal of the Shiite group to 30 kms. The Beirut government said today that 5,000 Lebanese soldiers are already prepared to occupy the positions in the south of the country that Israel will abandon, although the IDF forces will have a period of 60 days to withdraw completely.
This agreement highlights the difference between the case of Gaza and that of Lebanon. In the Palestinian enclave there was never a firm will of the Western countries to achieve a ceasefire, while Israel insisted that it would not accept it no matter how much pressure it was subjected to. The case of Lebanon is different because it is an internationally recognized country in which Hezbollah is represented as a political party in Parliament.
Finally, the Israel-Hezbollah agreement will be supervised by an international committee in which the United States and France will be represented.
Comments
Post a Comment